Cited time in webofscience Cited time in scopus

Cortical processing during robot and functional electrical stimulation

Title
Cortical processing during robot and functional electrical stimulation
Author(s)
Cho, WoosangVidaurre, CarmenAn, JinungBirbaumer, NielsRamos-Murguialday, Ander.
Issued Date
2023-03
Citation
Frontiers in Systems Neuroscience, v.17
Type
Article
Author Keywords
somatosensory mu rhythmrobotfunctional electrical stimulationkinematickineticneurorehabilitation
Keywords
EVENT-RELATED DESYNCHRONIZATIONBRAIN-COMPUTER INTERFACEBETA EEG-CHANGESSTROKE REHABILITATIONSENSORIMOTOR AREASFOREARM MUSCLESWRIST MOVEMENTSMU RHYTHMALPHASYNCHRONIZATION
ISSN
1662-5137
Abstract
Introduction: Like alpha rhythm, the somatosensory mu rhythm is suppressed in the presence of somatosensory inputs by implying cortical excitation. Sensorimotor rhythm (SMR) can be classified into two oscillatory frequency components: mu rhythm (8–13 Hz) and beta rhythm (14–25 Hz). The suppressed/enhanced SMR is a neural correlate of cortical activation related to efferent and afferent movement information. Therefore, it would be necessary to understand cortical information processing in diverse movement situations for clinical applications. Methods: In this work, the EEG of 10 healthy volunteers was recorded while fingers were moved passively under different kinetic and kinematic conditions for proprioceptive stimulation. For the kinetics aspect, afferent brain activity (no simultaneous volition) was compared under two conditions of finger extension: (1) generated by an orthosis and (2) generated by the orthosis simultaneously combined and assisted with functional electrical stimulation (FES) applied at the forearm muscles related to finger extension. For the kinematic aspect, the finger extension was divided into two phases: (1) dynamic extension and (2) static extension (holding the extended position). Results: In the kinematic aspect, both mu and beta rhythms were more suppressed during a dynamic than a static condition. However, only the mu rhythm showed a significant difference between kinetic conditions (with and without FES) affected by attention to proprioception after transitioning from dynamic to static state, but the beta rhythm was not. Discussion: Our results indicate that mu rhythm was influenced considerably by muscle kinetics during finger movement produced by external devices, which has relevant implications for the design of neuromodulation and neurorehabilitation interventions. © 2023 Cho, Vidaurre, An, Birbaumer and Ramos-Murguialday. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
URI
http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11750/46194
DOI
10.3389/fnsys.2023.1045396
Publisher
Frontiers Media

qrcode

  • twitter
  • facebook
  • mendeley

Items in Repository are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

BROWSE