Communities & Collections
Researchers & Labs
Titles
DGIST
LIBRARY
DGIST R&D
Detail View
Department of Robotics and Mechatronics Engineering
Surgical Robotics & Augmented Reality Lab
1. Journal Articles
Navigation-assisted suture anchor insertion for arthroscopic rotator cuff repair
Micic, Ivan
;
Kholinne, Erica
;
Hong, Hanpyo
;
Choi, Hyunseok
;
Kwak, Jae-Man
;
Sun, Yucheng
;
Hong, Jaesung
;
Koh, Kyoung-Hwan
;
Jeon, In-Ho
Department of Robotics and Mechatronics Engineering
Surgical Robotics & Augmented Reality Lab
1. Journal Articles
Citations
WEB OF SCIENCE
Citations
SCOPUS
Metadata Downloads
XML
Excel
Title
Navigation-assisted suture anchor insertion for arthroscopic rotator cuff repair
DGIST Authors
Hong, Jaesung
Issued Date
2019-12
Citation
Micic, Ivan. (2019-12). Navigation-assisted suture anchor insertion for arthroscopic rotator cuff repair. doi: 10.1186/s12891-019-3021-2
Type
Article
Article Type
Article
Author Keywords
Navigation
;
Arthroscopic
;
Subscapularis
;
Anchor
;
Location
;
Angle
Keywords
DEADMAN THEORY
;
ANGLE
;
RELIABILITY
;
STRENGTH
ISSN
1471-2474
Abstract
Background: Suture anchor placement for subscapularis repair is challenging. Determining the exact location and optimum angle relative to the subscapularis tendon direction is difficult because of the mismatch between a distorted arthroscopic view and the actual anatomy of the footprint. This study aimed to compare the reliability and reproducibility of the navigation-assisted anchoring technique with conventional arthroscopic anchor fixation. Methods: Arthroscopic shoulder models were tested by five surgeons. The conventional and navigation-assisted methods of suture anchoring in the subscapularis footprint on the humeral head were tested by each surgeon seven times. Angular results and anchor locations were measured and compared using the Wilcoxon signed rank test. Interobserver intraclass correlation coefficients (ICCs) were analyzed among the surgeons. Results: The mean angular errors of the targeted anchor fixation guide without and with navigation were 17° and 2° (p < 0.05), respectively, and the translational errors were 15 and 3 mm (p < 0.05), respectively. All participants showed a narrow range of anchor fixation angular and translational errors from the original target. Among the surgeons, the interobserver reliabilities of angular errors for ICCs of the navigation-assisted and conventional methods were 0.897 and 0.586, respectively, and the interobserver ICC reliabilities for translational error were 0.938 and 0.619, respectively. Conclusions: The navigation system may help surgeons be more aware of the surrounding anatomy and location, providing better guidance for anchor orientation, including footprint location and anchor angle. © 2019 The Author(s).
URI
http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11750/11409
DOI
10.1186/s12891-019-3021-2
Publisher
BioMed Central Ltd.
Show Full Item Record
File Downloads
2-s2.0-85077337081.pdf
공유
공유하기
Total Views & Downloads