Cited time in webofscience Cited time in scopus

Full metadata record

DC Field Value Language
dc.contributor.author Lee, Min Young -
dc.contributor.author Kim, Young Cheol -
dc.contributor.author Jang, Jongmoon -
dc.contributor.author Jung, Jae Yun -
dc.contributor.author Choi, Hongsoo -
dc.contributor.author Jang, Jeong Hun -
dc.contributor.author Choung, Yun-Hoon -
dc.date.accessioned 2020-07-07T10:42:06Z -
dc.date.available 2020-07-07T10:42:06Z -
dc.date.created 2020-06-16 -
dc.date.issued 2020-09 -
dc.identifier.issn 0001-6489 -
dc.identifier.uri http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11750/12041 -
dc.description.abstract Background: Clinically, steroids have been used for hearing preservation both topically and systemically during cochlear implantation. Objective: This study compared steroid efficacy for hearing preservation among different types of delivery modes using an animal experiment. Materials and methods: For 76 guinea pigs, topical and systemic delivery methods, four pump types with different infusion rates, delivery durations, and total steroid amounts were used. Threshold changes of 8, 16, and 32 kHz after dummy electrode insertion were evaluated at 1 and 4 weeks and compared among delivery method and pump types. Inflammatory response in the cochlea was histologically compared. Results: For topical delivery groups, long-term release showed advantages in preserving hearing. Systemic delivery groups showed smaller threshold shifts than control group in all frequencies (p >.05). In short-term low dose application, compared to topical delivery, systemic delivery showed advantage in hearing preservation at both time point. However, others fail to show significant difference between two methods. Histologically, inflammatory response in the scala tympani at the basal turn was less in systemic delivery, especially in high dose and long-term. Conclusion and significance: The difference of hearing preservation was not obvious between two delivery methods. Higher dose and longer duration might have advantages in hearing preservation. © 2020 Acta Oto-Laryngologica AB (Ltd). -
dc.language English -
dc.publisher Taylor & Francis -
dc.title Dexamethasone delivery for hearing preservation in animal cochlear implant model: continuity, long-term release, and fast release rate -
dc.type Article -
dc.identifier.doi 10.1080/00016489.2020.1763457 -
dc.identifier.wosid 000538906000001 -
dc.identifier.scopusid 2-s2.0-85085896560 -
dc.identifier.bibliographicCitation Acta Oto-Laryngologica, v.140, no.09, pp.713 - 722 -
dc.description.isOpenAccess FALSE -
dc.subject.keywordAuthor hearing preservation -
dc.subject.keywordAuthor cochlear implantation -
dc.subject.keywordAuthor mechanical trauma -
dc.subject.keywordAuthor drug delivery -
dc.subject.keywordAuthor Dexamethasone -
dc.subject.keywordPlus INNER-EAR -
dc.subject.keywordPlus FIBROSIS -
dc.subject.keywordPlus GUINEA-PIG MODEL -
dc.citation.endPage 722 -
dc.citation.number 09 -
dc.citation.startPage 713 -
dc.citation.title Acta Oto-Laryngologica -
dc.citation.volume 140 -
dc.description.journalRegisteredClass scie -
dc.description.journalRegisteredClass scopus -
dc.relation.journalResearchArea Otorhinolaryngology -
dc.relation.journalWebOfScienceCategory Otorhinolaryngology -
dc.type.docType Article -
Files in This Item:

There are no files associated with this item.

Appears in Collections:
Department of Robotics and Mechatronics Engineering Bio-Micro Robotics Lab 1. Journal Articles

qrcode

  • twitter
  • facebook
  • mendeley

Items in Repository are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

BROWSE