Communities & Collections
Researchers & Labs
Titles
DGIST
LIBRARY
DGIST R&D
Detail View
Department of Robotics and Mechatronics Engineering
Bio-Micro Robotics Lab
1. Journal Articles
Dexamethasone delivery for hearing preservation in animal cochlear implant model: continuity, long-term release, and fast release rate
Lee, Min Young
;
Kim, Young Cheol
;
Jang, Jongmoon
;
Jung, Jae Yun
;
Choi, Hongsoo
;
Jang, Jeong Hun
;
Choung, Yun-Hoon
Department of Robotics and Mechatronics Engineering
Bio-Micro Robotics Lab
1. Journal Articles
Citations
WEB OF SCIENCE
Citations
SCOPUS
Metadata Downloads
XML
Excel
Title
Dexamethasone delivery for hearing preservation in animal cochlear implant model: continuity, long-term release, and fast release rate
Issued Date
2020-09
Citation
Lee, Min Young. (2020-09). Dexamethasone delivery for hearing preservation in animal cochlear implant model: continuity, long-term release, and fast release rate. Acta Oto-Laryngologica, 140(09), 713–722. doi: 10.1080/00016489.2020.1763457
Type
Article
Author Keywords
hearing preservation
;
cochlear implantation
;
mechanical trauma
;
drug delivery
;
Dexamethasone
Keywords
INNER-EAR
;
FIBROSIS
;
GUINEA-PIG MODEL
ISSN
0001-6489
Abstract
Background: Clinically, steroids have been used for hearing preservation both topically and systemically during cochlear implantation. Objective: This study compared steroid efficacy for hearing preservation among different types of delivery modes using an animal experiment. Materials and methods: For 76 guinea pigs, topical and systemic delivery methods, four pump types with different infusion rates, delivery durations, and total steroid amounts were used. Threshold changes of 8, 16, and 32 kHz after dummy electrode insertion were evaluated at 1 and 4 weeks and compared among delivery method and pump types. Inflammatory response in the cochlea was histologically compared. Results: For topical delivery groups, long-term release showed advantages in preserving hearing. Systemic delivery groups showed smaller threshold shifts than control group in all frequencies (p >.05). In short-term low dose application, compared to topical delivery, systemic delivery showed advantage in hearing preservation at both time point. However, others fail to show significant difference between two methods. Histologically, inflammatory response in the scala tympani at the basal turn was less in systemic delivery, especially in high dose and long-term. Conclusion and significance: The difference of hearing preservation was not obvious between two delivery methods. Higher dose and longer duration might have advantages in hearing preservation. © 2020 Acta Oto-Laryngologica AB (Ltd).
URI
http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11750/12041
DOI
10.1080/00016489.2020.1763457
Publisher
Taylor & Francis
Show Full Item Record
File Downloads
There are no files associated with this item.
공유
공유하기
Total Views & Downloads