Communities & Collections
Researchers & Labs
Titles
DGIST
LIBRARY
DGIST R&D
Detail View
Department of Brain Sciences
Lab of Neuro-Metabolism & Neurometabolomic Research Center
1. Journal Articles
Guidelines for the use and interpretation of assays for monitoring autophagy (4th edition)
Kim, Eun-Kyoung
;
Yu, Seong-Woon
;
Lee, Sung Bae
Department of Brain Sciences
Lab of Neuro-Metabolism & Neurometabolomic Research Center
1. Journal Articles
Department of Brain Sciences
Laboratory of Neuronal Cell Death
1. Journal Articles
Department of Brain Sciences
Laboratory of Neurodegenerative Diseases and Aging
1. Journal Articles
Citations
WEB OF SCIENCE
Citations
SCOPUS
Metadata Downloads
XML
Excel
Title
Guidelines for the use and interpretation of assays for monitoring autophagy (4th edition)
DGIST Authors
Kim, Eun-Kyoung
;
Yu, Seong-Woon
;
Lee, Sung Bae
Issued Date
2021-01
Citation
Kim, Eun-Kyoung. (2021-01). Guidelines for the use and interpretation of assays for monitoring autophagy (4th edition). doi: 10.1080/15548627.2020.1797280
Type
Article
Author Keywords
Autophagosome
;
cancer
;
flux
;
LC3
;
lysosome
;
macroautophagy
;
neurodegeneration
;
phagophore
;
stress
;
vacuole
Keywords
CHAPERONE-MEDIATED AUTOPHAGY
;
ACTIVATED PROTEIN-KINASE
;
PROGRAMMED CELL-DEATH
;
STARVATION-INDUCED AUTOPHAGY
;
ENDOPLASMIC-RETICULUM STRESS
;
NF-KAPPA-B
;
BREAST-CANCER CELLS
;
LIFE-SPAN EXTENSION
;
AMYOTROPHIC-LATERAL-SCLEROSI
;
SGENOME-WIDE ASSOCIATION
ISSN
1554-8627
Abstract
In 2008, we published the first set of guidelines for standardizing research in autophagy. Since then, this topic has received increasing attention, and many scientists have entered the field. Our knowledge base and relevant new technologies have also been expanding. Thus, it is important to formulate on a regular basis updated guidelines for monitoring autophagy in different organisms. Despite numerous reviews, there continues to be confusion regarding acceptable methods to evaluate autophagy, especially in multicellular eukaryotes. Here, we present a set of guidelines for investigators to select and interpret methods to examine autophagy and related processes, and for reviewers to provide realistic and reasonable critiques of reports that are focused on these processes. These guidelines are not meant to be a dogmatic set of rules, because the appropriateness of any assay largely depends on the question being asked and the system being used. Moreover, no individual assay is perfect for every situation, calling for the use of multiple techniques to properly monitor autophagy in each experimental setting. Finally, several core components of the autophagy machinery have been implicated in distinct autophagic processes (canonical and noncanonical autophagy), implying that genetic approaches to block autophagy should rely on targeting two or more autophagy-related genes that ideally participate in distinct steps of the pathway. Along similar lines, because multiple proteins involved in autophagy also regulate other cellular pathways including apoptosis, not all of them can be used as a specific marker for bona fide autophagic responses. Here, we critically discuss current methods of assessing autophagy and the information they can, or cannot, provide. Our ultimate goal is to encourage intellectual and technical innovation in the field. © 2020 Informa UK Limited, trading as Taylor & Francis Group.
URI
http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11750/13868
DOI
10.1080/15548627.2020.1797280
Publisher
Bellwether Publishing, Ltd.
Show Full Item Record
File Downloads
There are no files associated with this item.
공유
공유하기
Related Researcher
Kim, Eun-Kyoung
김은경
Department of Brain Sciences
read more
Total Views & Downloads